Sunday, October 08, 2017

Matthew 21:33-46

Once again we find Jesus in the Temple. It’s Holy Week. Good Friday is on the horizon. We listen as Jesus continues to describe the realm of God through parables. Last Sunday we heard Jesus tell the parable of two brothers. One brother told his father he would go work in the vineyard, but never did. The other resisted, but finally went off to work. Which of the brothers did the will of the father, who asked them to tend the vineyard? Jesus then told another parable of the vineyard. In this parable, a landowner planted a vineyard and then rented it out, hoping to reap a profit from the renters’ produce. Unfortunately, when the time came to collect this produce, the renters violently resisted these efforts. Finally, in desperation, the landowners sent his son, hoping they would respect him. Instead of respecting the son, they decided to kill him and try to take his inheritance. How do you think the landowner will respond? Won’t the landowner respond in kind by punishing those who resisted? 

I expect that many of us struggle with the idea of divine judgment. It doesn’t fit our vision of a loving and merciful God. Yet, here we have a parable of divine judgment. God’s realm will be taken from the original renters and given to others who will produce good fruit for the realm. Those who reject the cornerstone of the realm of God, will be crushed on it. 

Sunday, October 01, 2017

By What Authority? A Sermon for Pentecost 17A


Matthew 21:23-32

Aimee Semple McPherson was a famous Pentecostal evangelist during the first half of the 20th century. I love talking about her because she was a pioneer in so many ways. I might not agree with her theology or her politics, but I have always admired her persistence in answering a call to ministry when very few women were given permission to preach. Not only did she preach, but she launched a radio station in the early days of radio, a denomination, and a college. When the religious authorities questioned her right to preach, and demanded she show them her “credentials,” she simply responded that God had called her, the Spirit had empowered her, and she had no choice but to preach. If the religious authorities had a problem with her call, then they should take up their concerns with God. 

After Jesus entered Jerusalem on that first Palm Sunday to shouts of adoration from the crowd, he went to the Temple and began to teach and to heal. The religious leaders approached him and asked for his credentials to preach and teach. By what authority have you taken up residence in this holy Temple? 

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Fair Wages in God's Realm -- A Sermon for Pentecost 16A

Matthew 20:1-16

Jesus’ parables are subversive, because they reveal things about the realm of God. They’re stories we can read in different ways. Sometimes parables clarify things, but they can also confuse things enough that they start important conversations about what it means to live in the realm of God. The realm of God doesn’t operate like other realms, which is  why Jesus told Pilate that “my kingdom is not of this world.” (John 18:36)

Ever since Peter made the Good Confession and received his commission (Matt. 16:13-20), Jesus had been revealing things about the “Kingdom of Heaven” and the Church.  This parable is another contribution to that conversation. There is an important phrase that surrounds the parable: “The last will be first, and the first will be last.” 

The first instance of the phrase brings to a close Jesus’ conversation with the one we often call the “Rich Young Ruler” about what is required to enter the realm of God. That conversation centered around the hold our treasure has on our hearts and minds. In many ways, this parable is a continuation of that conversation. (Matt. 19:16-30)


In the parable of the Vineyard, a landowner goes out early in the morning to hire workers to tend the vineyard. The landowner hires the necessary number of workers, and agrees to pay them the normal day’s wage. The owner has workers, and the workers have a job, at least for one day. Everyone is happy, except that this isn’t the end of the story. The day has only just begun.  

As I read the parable, I thought about the day labor pools that gather in certain locations in Santa Barbara. When you gather at a place like that, you never know what the day will bring. You might work on a construction site one day, and mow lawns the next. It’s quite possible that on some days, you won’t find any work. You may stand there all day, in the sun, hoping someone will come along and give you a job so you can pay rent and provide groceries for the family. Most of the day laborers in Santa Barbara are Latinos, and at least some of them are undocumented. Prospective employers stop by, tell the group what they’re looking for, and how many they need to hire. When they reach the allotted number, the workers get into the vehicles and head off for work. There is a  promise payment at the end of the day, but of course, since most of these workers are paid in cash, there’s no certainty of payment. Besides, there are no benefits and no protections, especially if you’re undocumented. That means the employer has all the power. What I observed in Santa Barbara occurs all across the country, including here.

While it isn’t quite the same, I do have one day’s experience as a day laborer. When I returned home from my first year of college, my mother told me that the local ice house was hiring. Neither of us knew what that meant, but I decided to go down and check things out. When I arrived, I was told to sign in and then join the room full people hoping to get called up, so they could spend the day unloading trains filled with cartons of frozen food. When my name came up, I was told to go down into the freezer, which is where I spent the rest of the day stacking boxes of frozen broccoli that had come off the train. It was hard work and it was very cold in that freezer. At the end of the day, I picked up my wages, and started looking for a steadier job the next morning. Fortunately I landed a  job at the local college working as part of the summer cleaning crew. So, while my brief experience as a day laborer, wasn’t anything close to what I observed in Santa Barbara, it did give me an inkling as to what it means to be a day laborer.

This parable is a story about day laborers. We have an employer who seems generous at first read. We also have a pool of workers seeking a chance to earn a day’s wage. Is this a parable about generosity or is it a parable about fairness? How you interpret the parable may depend on which of these two ideals you use as a lens to read the parable. 

I would suggest that the issue here is not the work, but the payment. Did you notice that only the people hired at the beginning of the day had an agreed-upon wage? Everyone else was hired without any agreed-upon wage. They probably thought they would get  a prorated wage. If you work eight hours for ten dollars an hour, you’ll get eighty dollars. If you only work two hours, you should expect to receive twenty dollars. That seems fair. After all, you “reap what you sow.” But that’s not the way it works in this parable.

When the owner returns at the end of the day to pay the workers, the owner starts with the most recent hires. The group hired at the end of the day, people that may have worked a couple of hours at most, received the full day’s wage. The same thing happened with each group of workers. They seem thrilled, because none of them expected to receive the full day’s wage. Now they had enough money to provide food and housing for their families for at least one more day. Since they didn’t expect to receive the full wage, none of them will complain. 

There is one group of workers, however, who began to expect a bonus. Since they had worked all day in the vineyard, wouldn’t it be fair for them to receive more than the person who worked for just a few hours. After all, agricultural work is difficult, backbreaking work. The vineyard can be hot and even dangerous. But, when the owner gave them their pay, they discovered that they had received the same wage. The owner may claim to be generous, but they felt used. They were upset. Jesus concludes the parable with the words: “The last shall be first, and the first shall be last.”

How should we read this parable today? Traditionally, it has been read as a story about divine grace. It serves to answer the theological question: What must I do to receive eternal life? Read that way, the parable suggests that everything is up to God. Your status in heaven doesn’t depend on whether you’ve been a good Christian all your life, or you said yes to Jesus on your death bed. In heaven, we all get the same reward. 

When it comes to the question of getting into heaven, I vividly remember the conversations we had in the theology class I taught at the college. We were discussing universal salvation, and some of my students didn’t think it was fair for them to live a Christian life, if everyone got a free pass into heaven. In other words, why bother living a Christian life, when you could be out having fun with your non-Christian friends? So, is the Christian life that burdensome, that you would complain if someone got in on God’s grace without first living a “good Christian life?”  

That’s one way of reading the parable. It simply speaks to the next life. But, what if we read the parable through the eyes of the poor? What if the realm of God has this world implications? When we read the parable in the light of social and economic contexts, what is fair and just?

With that question in mind, Catherine and Justo Gonzalez write that “justice looks different to those who are employed than to those who seek work and do not find it” [Preaching God’s Transforming Justice, p. 402]. So, if we think of the realm of God having this world implications, what are fair wages? Which side in this conversation should we take? Should we stand with the workers hired at the beginning of the day? Or should we commend the owner for making sure that everyone had enough money to pay their bills? According to Catherine and Justo Gonzalez, “the end of the parable shows an employer who holds each worker as deserving of a wage that supports life. Even time spent waiting for work was in itself work” [Preaching, p. 402]. So, what is just and what is right? 

If  the realm of God exists on earth as it does in heaven, then what does this parable have to say to us about how we live in this world? How does it affect the way we vote, shop, use electricity, or drive our cars? What are the implications for employment and immigration status? What might this parable say about income inequality? What if this is about more than who gets into heaven?

At the end of the parable, Jesus declares: “So the last shall be first, and the first will be last.” At the end of the day the parable seems to speak of God’s realm in terms of radical equality. In the realm of God, everyone deserves to be treated with respect and honor, because everyone is equal in the eyes of God. Yes, the last shall be first, and the first shall be last. 

Preached by:
Dr. Robert D. Cornwall, Pastor
Central Woodward Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
Troy, MI 
September 24, 2017
Pentecost 16A

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Forgiveness -- Journey to Generosity - Sermon for Pentecost 15A


Matthew 18:21-35

We pick up our journey to generosity on the road with Jesus. After Jesus gave the disciples a lesson on conflict resolution, Peter raises a question about forgiveness in the context of the church.  He asks: If someone in “the church sins against me, how often should I forgive?” Is seven times enough? While that may seem generous to us, Jesus decided to raise the ante to seventy-seven times. Isn’t that a bit extreme? How is anybody going to keep track of that many offenses?

If we’re honest, we all keep a list of people whose offenses against us we would rather not forgive. Truth be told, we would like to take our revenge against them. But, if we follow Jesus’ word of wisdom here, that won’t happen. Vengeance is off the table. 

This morning we have a convergence of themes in the service. We have a word about forgiveness, a word about stewardship, and a word about peace. How might these three themes fit together? What do forgiveness, stewardship, and peace have to do with Jesus’ vision for the church and for the world?

Sunday, September 10, 2017

Gathering in the Name -- Sermon for Pentecost 14A


Matthew 18:15-20

What does it mean to gather in the name of Jesus? What does it mean to say that all are welcome, and all means all? Are there no boundaries? No qualifications? No form of accountability? Are there protocols we should be aware of? Who decides what these protocols might be?   
As Disciples, we pride ourselves on our theological openness. We don’t have a creed. There are no theological grounds for excommunication. Instead of focusing on boundaries, we focus on our center, which is our common confession that “Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God.” Even that confession allows for breadth of interpretation. But, does that really mean that anything and everything goes?

The word we’ve heard this morning from Matthew 18 is a challenging one. It’s also unique to Matthew’s Gospel. This suggests that there’s something afoot in Matthew’s community. Someone or some group is causing problems, and Matthew wants to set up a process to handle the problem before it gets out of hand.